From owner-freebsd-security Mon Aug 11 10:24:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA17567 for security-outgoing; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 10:24:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [207.240.140.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA17544 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 10:24:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (spork@localhost) by super-g.inch.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA04343; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 17:27:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 17:27:59 -0400 (EDT) From: spork X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com To: Brian Mitchell cc: "Jonathan A. Zdziarski" , bugtraq@netspace.org, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: procfs hole In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 10 Aug 1997, Brian Mitchell wrote: > any setuid program. As noted, the easiest way to avoid the problem is just > to disable procfs -- nobody really uses it anyways. Would anyone be willing to give a short explanation of the /proc filesystem and what the original conception of it accomplished? Thanks, Charles