From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jan 6 6:54:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from virtual-voodoo.com (virtual-voodoo.com [204.120.165.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08B115676; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 06:54:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@virtual-voodoo.com) Received: (from steve@localhost) by virtual-voodoo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA72606; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 09:47:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from steve) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 09:47:56 -0500 From: Steve Ames To: Brad Knowles Cc: Donn Miller , Julian Elischer , Darren Reed , Yoshinobu Inoue , louie@TransSys.COM, committers@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Message-ID: <20000106094756.B30328@virtual-voodoo.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i In-Reply-To: ; from Brad Knowles on Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 12:55:06PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > More releases more often are better than indefinitely holding up > releases waiting for just that one last thing to be finished. I think a recent thread on -STABLE indicates that the majority of end users seem to believe that -RELEASE means STABLE and should be fully operational not a wide-beta under a release name. I also thing that an extremely complete and stable .0 release would be good for the FreeBSD release image. -Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message