From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul  2 13:06:42 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D9C2EC5
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Jul 2014 13:06:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.mezonplus.ru (mx1.mezonplus.ru [91.211.181.133])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ECE92303
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Jul 2014 13:06:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.mezonplus.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mx1.mezonplus.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEEF39B49
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Jul 2014 17:06:39 +0400 (MSK)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (nb-latitude.users.mezon.local [192.168.0.102])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.mezonplus.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBCF139B48
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Jul 2014 17:06:39 +0400 (MSK)
Message-ID: <53B403DF.4080006@mezonplus.ru>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:06:39 +0400
From: Alexander Moisseev <moiseev@mezonplus.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/32.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Dump an Unmounted Journaled UFS Filesystem
References: <CAOD8YqoB+ZpS9XBgFf2=WjWmsG5f9MsiwSis1cB3irKOOz=ZSw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOD8Yqq5O1ZJ1RwGDTLnLtcvR0MhbLZEfWnOihaJL0xz875pOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140702114213.1396bb21@X220.alogt.com> <53B3A1BB.8070009@mezonplus.ru>
 <20140702175834.3a8c7fa3@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140702175834.3a8c7fa3@X220.alogt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:06:42 -0000

02.07.2014 13:58, Erich Dollansky пишет:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 10:07:55 +0400
> Alexander Moisseev <moiseev@mezonplus.ru> wrote:
>
>> 02.07.2014 7:42, Erich Dollansky пишет:
>>> what should be wrong by first running a fsck and then the dump?
>>>
>>
>> Erich, what potential problems you expect if the fsck hasn't been ran
>> before the dump?
>>
> I do not know what will be the result if you run a fsck on the restored
> file system when it was damaged.
>
I am sorry, Erich, but I didn't get the point about fsck in given context. OP asked about _unmounted_ journaled filesystem. You can't run fsck write enabled on live file system.But I see no difference between SU and SU+J, if file system is umounted.