From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 22 21:38:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746C6106564A; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:38:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339FD8FC15; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F2E62CE; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:38:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DB6148556; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:38:02 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Jilles Tjoelker References: <201111211640.pALGedXg051270@svn.freebsd.org> <20111122204154.GA14090@stack.nl> <861uszkfgw.fsf@ds4.des.no> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:38:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <861uszkfgw.fsf@ds4.des.no> ("Dag-Erling =?utf-8?Q?Sm=C3=B8rg?= =?utf-8?Q?rav=22's?= message of "Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:35:43 +0100") Message-ID: <86wrarj0sl.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r227798 - in head: . lib/libpam lib/libpam/modules X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:38:04 -0000 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > Jilles Tjoelker writes: > > Although this will work, I think it trades the quality of the binaries > > for a cleaner build system. It is better to pass all libraries to ld(1) > > even though a .so may have unresolved references: the NEEDED entry > > serves as an additional protection against version mismatches and symbol > > versioning (if you ever add it) requires ld(1) to have access to the .so > > containing the definition so it knows the version name to store in the > > output file. > These are plugins. The names and prototypes of the functions they > export were set in stone 15 years ago. Sorry, that was a bit unclear. What I was trying to say is that symbol versioning is not and will never be an issue. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no