From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 21:05:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B6B106564A for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:05:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lytboris@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0318FC1E for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so3054967wib.13 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:05:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xpPcAzmqab5VNGI2PEpoezvsksOCZR4vcya0j3DKb9U=; b=JXr3Ei50Q3MbfXx9PTAYMkrlAzdowxCLvB6UcFtMEzOqscejYFOaoUT7kIgORtYRd8 qKyr+2OrY7XkrqAj5g/Zc4PkLAVi53XGCpVCDaGmpZAi03H3Z/w4MYbjT876n6a6fsIH XI2f58r04JOUSlGO3TvGiEXFxflTIzw8ibt/Iu54+nMaXcE72Kx8M7GO1IDCrVNYB4te Aa4EjHXUTvbbAOnnkv6rcP1Sdo9t+ZFANksX1YyxKThy6kYwmlK9XaogrSShT0/BuhN3 3+CBcd2u6KQlqFSMC/soxs8rlrR9IozeLFTmEbuBCFkb8M4B2RxhCbZyuGuTH+KXfZWd lJnQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.94.33 with SMTP id cz1mr13153339wib.13.1332709539295; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.72.6 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:05:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4f6f67a7.4a0c440a.3941.ffffc865@mx.google.com> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:05:39 +0400 Message-ID: From: Lytochkin Boris To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: [ath][CURRENT] Triangle-shaped network performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:05:40 -0000 On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > do you have a lot of broadcast traffic on your network? I whould say none: ~>time tcpdump -nli wlan0 not ether host b0:48:7a:da:0e:59 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on wlan0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes 01:04:00.046877 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.2.1 tell 192.168.2.101, length 28 01:04:00.046911 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.2.1 tell 192.168.2.101, length 28 ^C 2 packets captured 174 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel tcpdump -nli wlan0 not ether host b0:48:7a:da:0e:59 0.00s user 0.25s system 1% cpu 21.292 total -- Boris Lytochkin