Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 04 Feb 1998 15:19:37 -0800
From:      Jamie Lawrence <jal@42is.com>
To:        Ronald Kuehn <kuehn@rz.tu-clausthal.de>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: minimalist /etc/services and /etc/inetd.conf Re: Security
Message-ID:  <3.0.3.32.19980204151937.009b37d0@colonel.42inc.com>
In-Reply-To: <199802042243.XAA00434@sinfonix.rz.tu-clausthal.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:43 PM 2/4/98 +0100, you wrote:
>In list.freebsd-questions you write:

>> "Don't play with /etc/services" seems like pretty general advice
>> not applicable in all (or perhaps even most) situations.
>
>Again, "don't play with /etc/services". It's for mappings between
>port numbers and service names only. It has nothing do to with services
>you currently run. That's the job of inetd (/etc/inetd.conf) and
>/etc/rc.* (for running standalone services).
>Removing lines from /etc/services buys you nothing but trouble.

I'm well aware of the function of /etc/services, and I disagree. 

Should that be what one wants to do, then that would be the proper
course of action.

A machine running little other than an httpd and sshd has no need to
know that port 4045 maps to lockd. And so on.

-j



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.3.32.19980204151937.009b37d0>