Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 May 2007 11:26:44 -0500
From:      Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Looking for speed increases in "make index" and pkg_version for ports
Message-ID:  <465B02C4.2020508@math.missouri.edu>
In-Reply-To: <f3cuvl$3q5$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <4659EF80.70100__16104.363036766$1180300054$gmane$org@math.missouri.edu> <f3cuvl$3q5$1@sea.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ivan Voras wrote:
> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>> I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for "make
>> index" and pkg_version and things like that.  So for example, in
>> pkg_version, it calls "make -V PKGNAME" for every installed package. Now
>> "make -V PKGNAME" should be a speedy operation, but the make has to load
>> in and analyze bsd.port.mk, a quite complicated file with about 200,000
>> characters in it, when all it is needing to do is to figure out the
>> value of the variable PKGNAME.
> 
> As long as far-out ideas are being discussed, how about caching such
> information (including dependenices) in a file (I'd call it a database
> but then I'd had to start a holy war :) ) so it's calculated only once,
> preferably on the portsnap / cvsup servers and not at the end-user?

Because the information is not a constant.  For example, the mpg123 port 
changes its PKGNAME as soon as esound is installed.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?465B02C4.2020508>