From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 6 21:49:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F62106564A; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 21:49:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yerenkow@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914708FC0C; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 21:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwd18 with SMTP id wd18so3401958obb.13 for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:49:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LTTUY4XC60toS4a/n3bB01uWJLb00dzOGoJOejaFpSM=; b=tSfRFuBKUBVWsdEmtBh7t+/Y/cH7SZsAh69/Ga7QZ2RYTb8D7k1lYjgfWxbtIds1VI MyVRqyBuqdD8OZ7MOieXAoQ2FUOURkP1F3nGlgYsHE5meDxaRV9qVuc2vZ9+AAeO5XMN Q1OpmvcSfdnj9vcFB9f3MVclUlF7AjtHWZ8Ng= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.74.36 with SMTP id q4mr6118227obv.77.1325886584137; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:49:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.150.70 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:49:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F072C13.6000606@gwdg.de> <4F073B1B.6000707@gwdg.de> Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:49:44 +0200 Message-ID: From: Alexander Yerenkow To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel does not build on 10.0-CURRENT (amd64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:49:44 -0000 2012/1/6 Adrian Chadd > On 6 January 2012 10:19, Rainer Hurling wrote: > > > I commented all wireless network drivers and their options out. But the > > error remains. Is it necessary to have this option uncommented even when > the > > driver ath is commented out? > > Yes, because of how the wlan/ath modules are built. You need to have > AH_SUPPORT_AR5416 in the kernel config file, as the driver/module > currently doesn't build without it. > I'm sorry for intruding in this topic, but it seems to me similar subject; Did FreeBSD ever tried to make config variables structured and with specified dependencies? To make clear what I mean - is anyone tried to implement some deps spec file (Or some special Makefile's sections, whatever), so if you specified feature A in kernel, it can check if you also specified B (which is required by A)? In this way config could provide feedback when you trying to build kernel without needed dependencies, and many peoples could save their time not compiling non-buildable kernel. > I'll eventually fix that, but right now I just want to leave that > option in and not hack up the Makefile to define said option. > Otherwise other options (eg enabling 11n, enabling hal debugging, etc) > are completely ignored when building modules. > > Same with IEEE80211_SUPPORT_MESH i believe. I should really re-verify that. > > > Adrian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow