From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Nov 14 08:05:45 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA09226 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 08:05:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from word.smith.net.au (client42.securenet.net [205.236.147.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA09219 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 08:05:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au) Received: from word (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA00369 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 1997 02:17:07 +1030 (CST) Message-Id: <199711141547.CAA00369@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Nov 1997 12:30:43 -0800." <199711132030.MAA16638@kithrup.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 02:17:07 +1030 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I have been trying to get this working in FreeBSD since last night; right > now, I'm not sure why what is happening is happening. But I'm giving up -- > I've had it "explained" to me by Jordan that even if I got it working, it > would not be considered, because this is simply not anything that anyone > needs to worry about. Uh, what? And based solely on that, you are giving up? How many other dissenting voices do you need before you're willing to pick it up again? Sure, technically, it's somewhat of a nonissue, but from the publicity point of view it's really a pretty critical matter. Why is it that Jordan is "Mr FreeBSD" in your eyes? What about the rest of us? mike