From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 29 18:34:06 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099F216A400
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:34:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B488413C448
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:34:05 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846382085;
	Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:33:59 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BAB2207E;
	Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:33:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id E9519A1075; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:33:58 +0200 (CEST)
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To: Pieter de Goeje <pieter@degoeje.nl>
References: <460AE39B.4070706@root.org> <86odmcqylx.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<200703291905.00192.pieter@degoeje.nl> <86k5wzq4vx.fsf@dwp.des.no>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:33:58 +0200
In-Reply-To: <86k5wzq4vx.fsf@dwp.des.no> (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8r?=
	=?iso-8859-1?Q?grav's?= message of
	"Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:30:26 +0200")
Message-ID: <86fy7nq4q1.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org,
	Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Subject: Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:34:06 -0000

Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> Pieter de Goeje <pieter@degoeje.nl> writes:
> > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> > > No.  This is a violation of the FTP protocol.
> > I'm reading rfc 959 right now, and it include examples of CWD with
> > full pathname (multiple directories). Actually the rfc is kinda
> > vague about this.
> RFC959 does not require or guarantee that the path separator is /, nor
> that "CD ../foo" does what you expect.  There are also issues when the
> initial CWD is not / (the document part in an FTP URL is relative to
> the initial CWD, not absolute)

I guess I should amend "this is a violation of the FTP protocol" to
"this relies on assumptions which the FTP RFC does not allow us to
make, and is a violation of RFC1738"

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no