From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 29 19:34:17 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B71504;
 Wed, 29 May 2013 19:34:16 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st)
Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930D92FC;
 Wed, 29 May 2013 19:34:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.31.9.91] (unknown [213.225.137.129])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FA143B4E;
 Wed, 29 May 2013 14:34:09 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <51A65830.3040904@marino.st>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 21:34:08 +0200
From: John Marino <freebsdml@marino.st>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: The vim port needs a refresh
References: <20130524212318.B967FE6739@smtp.hushmail.com>
 <CADLo83_AgAH0fARvtoYYmw5UEf7+3nEEs6U+6+hY8r0MbTkWFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADLFtte5-hEoyvSgtUe5K-uO05rj=jE5ro2xujQcjD8PVA3rmw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADLo83_xF=HbE0pqLh0pyGwWh=R-7aMKinLUGyBjmNs_Wx9EZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADLFttfQ=58aJKY4RPRhRhK4RxcECAra4ObFMMbAknso-8=SJw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADLFttfQ=58aJKY4RPRhRhK4RxcECAra4ObFMMbAknso-8=SJw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>, "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>,
 Kenta Suzumoto <kentas@hush.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 19:34:17 -0000

On 5/29/2013 21:28, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>
> Fix the OPTIONS first and I will accept it in my ports. Pretty simple.
> Since I don't like OPTIONS, so I am not required to fix it. If you do
> really want OPTIONS to be added in my port then please fix it.
>
> Although, I have lost in track of which bugs have been fixed in
> OPTIONS. I know one important bug is:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2013-April/083035.html

Do any of your ports defer setting of PKGNAMEPREFIX?
In other words, is your stance on principle or does this bug actually 
affect you?

> As same as with the LICENSE. I will not add in my ports until he
> writes document of it. But I will accept the patch of it though. Well,
> again, I might be out of date but I seem still can't find it in the
> porter handbook as today.

I thought LICENSE was totally optional anyway....

John