Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:44:46 +0200
From:      Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@gmail.com>
To:        Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Cc:        toolchain@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th
Message-ID:  <CAMVU60ZVmCaYr=MyLsnz9tqD9O5m9Y8bgYiqtqvUXcYcXj-RmQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120911133215.GB87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References:  <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20120911104518.GF37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911120649.GA52235@freebsd.org> <20120911122122.GJ37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911123833.GA54483@freebsd.org> <848C813E-E6EC-4FAF-9374-B5583A077404@cederstrand.dk> <20120911133215.GB87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Steve Kargl
<sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> Interest twist of history.  GCC is not abandonware.

Correct, but GCC 4.2.1 is.

-- 
chs,



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMVU60ZVmCaYr=MyLsnz9tqD9O5m9Y8bgYiqtqvUXcYcXj-RmQ>