From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 17 14:19:29 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786391065673
	for <freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:19:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [80.249.188.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36ACA8FC19
	for <freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:19:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net
	[89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
	by ftp.translate.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1692713DF42
	for <freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:19:27 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:19:25 +0300
From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <301293893.20101217171925@serebryakov.spb.ru>
To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: 
Subject: sys/kern/subr_disk.c and sys/geom/sched/subr_disk.c - is it
	intentional now?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:19:29 -0000

Hello, Freebsd-geom.

  I've  found,  that  these  two files doesn't have any differencr but
function names & one diaganostic function in "generic" version.

  Is  it  intentional or it is artefact of times when "geom_sched" was
experemental code?

  No  comments  in "geom_sched-private" version is givent and it seems
as copy'n'paste which is dangerous -- for example, any changes in one
file should be transferred into other (or not?).

  Explanation of this situation in header of
sys/geom/sched/subr_disk.c is good idea, IMHO.

--=20
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>