From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 21 00:10:16 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45119106566C;
	Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:10:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com
	[209.85.215.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E99F8FC18;
	Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:10:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lahe6 with SMTP id e6so855200lah.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:10:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=4R4HVMNMEKhr8tEijcLsBoDo0mSXJwfOd6j4ieknL1M=;
	b=Kg1Fy4K6wlm2QA6ZU5/lCKJPUGVeMq/lTvtIzpng/Ax/MbOxjSsKItwIzThk5nYc71
	Fa4kRA5HVd7l02yO2/R3JJ9I2cuMayt87mVEUziBCEd+/aokjM5kV/B+kUKutiK/Ocpr
	8cWV2MEC9hJXzqhwVjw+rNmrtu871P532HPrU=
Received: by 10.112.82.226 with SMTP id l2mr8069225lby.102.1327104614127; Fri,
	20 Jan 2012 16:10:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.25.196 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:09:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20120120235645.GP31224@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
References: <CAF6rxg=EjkwFbXQt3i2Nnz6_dcZtdek-2YdqyZnAdVPxVaWR_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120112100840.GV31224@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<CAF6rxgne7M9xBb-mM1xsjPy3r-O+O+MzuYrsweG849V83MX3mA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAF6rxgn5uddFb4LOGb0E_OOpVMiFavOVHwnrKF7cFHb6tfrPjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAF6rxg=Xbh--nL3pebj=ra+09K+WJYen2JPVDWwR14+ifG-_iQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120120235645.GP31224@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:09:43 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF6rxgk5LEwvj_7WLk=WeuondJSSSNo2LBfZC7nqOkc5-c9YCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: jilles@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>,
	Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: dup3 syscall - atomic set O_CLOEXEC with dup2
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:10:16 -0000

2012/1/20 Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 06:25:42PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> I figure this isn't wanted?
> You silently ignored part of the notes that were provided,

I fixed the style violations you pointed out and removed
_SYS_SYSPROTO_H_ and friends.  Which else was there? If I missed
something I'm sorry.

> and keep
> complete silence on the primary question about non-standard

I thought I answered that already but I'll try again: I believe the
functionality is useful to developers even if it is non-standard. In
addition if it is standardized at some point in the future it is
unlikely to have different semantics than the ones implemented.

> and fractional nature of the patch.

How so? I am not including the generated parts in the patch. Should I?

> I see no reason to retype my previous response.

-- 
Eitan Adler