Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:09:43 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: jilles@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: dup3 syscall - atomic set O_CLOEXEC with dup2 Message-ID: <CAF6rxgk5LEwvj_7WLk=WeuondJSSSNo2LBfZC7nqOkc5-c9YCw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120120235645.GP31224@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <CAF6rxg=EjkwFbXQt3i2Nnz6_dcZtdek-2YdqyZnAdVPxVaWR_Q@mail.gmail.com> <20120112100840.GV31224@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <CAF6rxgne7M9xBb-mM1xsjPy3r-O%2BO%2BMzuYrsweG849V83MX3mA@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgn5uddFb4LOGb0E_OOpVMiFavOVHwnrKF7cFHb6tfrPjw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxg=Xbh--nL3pebj=ra%2B09K%2BWJYen2JPVDWwR14%2BifG-_iQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120120235645.GP31224@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2012/1/20 Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 06:25:42PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: >> I figure this isn't wanted? > You silently ignored part of the notes that were provided, I fixed the style violations you pointed out and removed _SYS_SYSPROTO_H_ and friends. Which else was there? If I missed something I'm sorry. > and keep > complete silence on the primary question about non-standard I thought I answered that already but I'll try again: I believe the functionality is useful to developers even if it is non-standard. In addition if it is standardized at some point in the future it is unlikely to have different semantics than the ones implemented. > and fractional nature of the patch. How so? I am not including the generated parts in the patch. Should I? > I see no reason to retype my previous response. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgk5LEwvj_7WLk=WeuondJSSSNo2LBfZC7nqOkc5-c9YCw>