From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 19 07:53:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEBC16A4CE for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 07:53:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.nativenerds.com (host-70-0-111-24.midco.net [24.111.0.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03B443D3F for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 07:53:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from estover@nativenerds.com) Received: from red (host-14-37-230-24.midco.net [24.230.37.14]) by mail.nativenerds.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2J83jCd010137 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:03:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from estover@nativenerds.com) From: Ed Stover To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1111192552.1768.15.camel@red.nativenerds.com> References: <1111192552.1768.15.camel@red.nativenerds.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Native Nerds Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:53:36 -0700 Message-Id: <1111218816.991.3.camel@red.nativenerds.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail.nativenerds.com Subject: Re: A quick question X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: estover@nativenerds.com List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 07:53:36 -0000 Thanks for the replys! FreeBSD communities are by far the best! On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 17:35 -0700, Ed Stover wrote: > I am in the process of designing a server to be used as a "pop toaster" > type deal. Basically, I have experience with sendmail and imap-uw but > knowing the limitations of that combination I am wondering what you > FreeBSD-ISP guys & gals use as your combinations on your high traffic > environments. Also, what is your opinion on using OpenLDAP vs FreeBSD's > built in NIS infrastructure in combination with those other your MTA MDA > set ups. Although with a some research on the net I have found that ISPs > and other large organization are drifting toward qmail. If you use qmail > +NIS or LDAP what was your experience like when replacing sendmail with > qmail on FreeBSD? Any response with be greatly appreciated. > > PS Any ideas on filtering inappropriate content from emails aside from > procmail? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"