Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 7 Aug 2022 18:51:02 -0300
From:      "Dr. Rolf Jansen" <freebsd-rj@cyclaero.com>
To:        freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
Subject:   Re: Looks like the arm 20220805 snapshots are still odd, so probably kern.geom.part.mbr.enforce_chs=0 was still in use
Message-ID:  <99DC4046-AB8D-4D10-9475-94A8DC89DCFA@cyclaero.com>
In-Reply-To: <6AF28022-A8E7-46B3-B64E-99D217E9B6AC@yahoo.com>
References:  <A1AA705B-531D-45A2-9A1F-89F759550D3A@yahoo.com> <EA1CDEC5-A29E-43C5-9437-050CDBEC2233@freebsd.org> <6AF28022-A8E7-46B3-B64E-99D217E9B6AC@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 07.08.2022 um 16:50 schrieb Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>:
>=20
> On 2022-Aug-7, at 12:32, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
>> Correct, it was set to =E2=80=9C0=E2=80=9D for these builds.
>>=20
>> I honestly do not have any idea where the problems you are seeing are =
creeping in.
>>=20
>> Should it be set back to =E2=80=9C1=E2=80=9D?  I=E2=80=99m not sure =
how to proceed otherwise.
>=20
> My guess is that if the release/tools/arm.subr line:
>=20
>              chroot ${CHROOTDIR} gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -a 64k =
${mddev}s2
>=20
> was instead (note the added -b use):
>=20
>              chroot ${CHROOTDIR} gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -b 64k -a =
64k ${mddev}s2
>=20
> then the line:
>=20
>              chroot ${CHROOTDIR} newfs -U -L rootfs /dev/${mddev}s2a
>=20
> would work as expected and things would still be aligned:
> no aliasing of BSD vs. freebsd-ufs. (In part this is by
> prior steps already having achieved alignment of BSD.)

=46rom a strict mathematical stand point of view, -a is not necessary =
when using -b with an aligned value.

Personally I don=E2=80=99t use the -a option of gpart anymore since it =
started to do funny magics in front of face. If I remember correct, =
gpart of the FreeBSD 9.x-RELEASES was still OK (or was it 8?). Nowadays, =
I align all my storage media by employing -b with a reasonable value.

Best regards

Rolf=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?99DC4046-AB8D-4D10-9475-94A8DC89DCFA>