From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 12 09:57:11 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE63D1065672
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:57:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D1F8FC0C
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:57:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674C014D984A;
	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:57:10 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id 9wXHLPhPNEEQ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:57:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.105] (catv-89-132-179-104.catv.broadband.hu
	[89.132.179.104])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE70014D9843;
	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:57:07 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4AD2FD6E.8090208@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:57:02 +0200
From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
References: <20091011145021.GG36937@acme.spoerlein.net>
	<20091011170918.GU71731@hoeg.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20091011170918.GU71731@hoeg.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Big Makefile patch for WARNS settings
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:57:11 -0000

Ed Schouten escribió:
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> * Ulrich Spörlein <uqs@spoerlein.net> wrote:
>   
>> Comments? Committers?
>>     
>
> Wouldn't it better to address the root of the problem while there? ;-)
>   
What I noticed is that the patch sets WARNS?=0 for a lot of utilities, 
which actually have higher WARNS-compliance. Even if we don't "address 
the root of the problem" right now, it would be nice to elaborate and 
set each WARNS level at the higher value possible.For example, 
usr.bin/ul is marked as 0 by the patch but it seems to me it is WARNS=6 
clean. I don't know the last sources, though, but I'm sure it will 
compile with at least WARNS=3.

-- 
Gabor Kovesdan
FreeBSD Volunteer

EMAIL: gabor@FreeBSD.org .:|:. gabor@kovesdan.org
WEB:   http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org