From owner-freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Mon Oct 9 10:02:46 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D2EE2BA13 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 10:02:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartmann@walstatt.org) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FD2971ADE; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 10:02:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartmann@walstatt.org) Received: from thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de ([77.180.190.132]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lusmr-1dJKO53rk1-0100Xh; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 12:02:37 +0200 Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 12:02:24 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: Allan Jude Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xeon Gold 6138's Running FBSD 11.1 and TrueOS Stable [GCC 5.4] Message-ID: <20171009120224.3f2ca1e6@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> In-Reply-To: <43eb65d2-ffed-8216-17f8-7936932e5e0a@freebsd.org> References: <43eb65d2-ffed-8216-17f8-7936932e5e0a@freebsd.org> Organization: WALSTATT User-Agent: OutScare 3.1415926 X-Operating-System: ImNotAnOperatingSystem 3.141592527 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/rePbvxrMaFY+S1D=Uv52lqZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:c0biFXc0T8/o8w+zGvpzuHdf/5/OSy2YRaK8i5ian/3ZjMY0sgu kFPwIjHJ2CqxXHEbT+Fmi8h3cr9CTbTiK7f1zHZQCokb3K9GDPf5rGo+aJfItLvRXdaCtxe jtW2Fh1vaDOKRgg1d5eQ2Qqs2ys+ON2kY4tocl4SzScA8J6hqw3VNk3dxKp6F84c/P99eHE OnbQS2ZnAen/aRbjF0MCg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:eWZIKq+igJU=:CmmZHenZTWtdPZ02t37fpo dV0IoppRMdBVEnDQVEmUOsWTC4so+2nuCAywYJxq15awGYGJTHuwQMhIS2MMuf/WpErI5bEmx mc4jGCNI5FfQssgTWMpA2odTSRrUkMlNtdEZNzpi/76ZNXGzYCSfKNJGFUxcFFnh0Rmfn2ZdX RS+uIZ/P68tOQbLH2VA20X1YR5QdpHREkS9IECtxoZY9ulZqqgFkdNms/T2M7yiN5Qy1UO1j6 lmD5D5UvZkuL3n/4b4q+CrpJI0poCpiI8CNhSMpIVIe4OQNQ/fSFuLNjf2Flw3tF2KfbdE614 ADdY6CAX29hp+yo6FVCH59qVdeZPPc1IuiLrasIsAgmN/3fjOkV0Rc84CJxIDpxd47gXoJ1FT cUxS3K7d2GIeijOUMGx/7kGFh18+6Qg8T6zP2rvEwaoB7ycVH2SNmsNlCToj8wrqt9tJjOccn VnNtwnzmpsAupa9B0fOoVhzzfK0uMLqhzFmJOJG7Zdmo9Eno5rzwMjFsCrTpLRu6W98SfLyo+ TwfAu0u8T0afzxIjZ22ZMin9UwkScTPS6uQzl/bPaVNp84+dMAEjt3O1dA0CI6CliTWUM0hMD LTzrJPdwiFdBJRz6/M3e+pFbUCq01oUj4YzgT0kwuHW8xf68gkWNyrGoTWKVIHn+3lmpI7o5v Vs17n7NcEeYddRgYSQGgCNgEwr07NPTQbzJWfSQB9qTJhnviewoWk4FZKrVmjA1whAVOgPtMJ ZfV6TeHnGGaXIULM+D0RP/tUYSkWnzY8oQmkNlBtSd7GesqNdUvdShRS8ubDOo3w2I6JN9Mqs IES5ehaRrq5VzaEivuNb+/CVHmvMQ== X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 10:02:46 -0000 --Sig_/rePbvxrMaFY+S1D=Uv52lqZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Sun, 8 Oct 2017 22:42:01 -0400 Allan Jude schrieb: > On 2017-10-08 21:03, grarpamp wrote: > > http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=3D25148 > >=20 > > While we have tested a number of Linux distributions on Intel's new > > Xeon Scalable platform, here are some initial BSD tests using two Xeon > > Gold 6138 processors with the Tyan GT24E-B7106 1U barebones server. > > FreeBSD 11.1 and the FreeBSD-derivative desktop/workstation-focused > > TrueOS (formerly known as PC-BSD) were the primary candidates for > > testing. TrueOS stable is currently tracking FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT > > development. > > When comparing the out-of-the-box performance of FreeBSD/TrueOS and > > even with running under the GCC compiler rather than LLVM Clang, the > > Linux distributions were offering noticeably better performance on > > this dual Intel Xeon Gold server. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freeb= sd.org" > > =20 >=20 > You might want to try enabling turbo boost. >=20 > sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq=3D9999 >=20 > This will change the cpu frequency from the default (2000 mhz) to 2001 > mhz, which will enable turbo boost (this specific CPU bursts to 3700 > mhz), so this will likely make a very large difference in your benchmarks. >=20 > To get more consistent results, you may actually want to disable > turboboost in the bios, and rerun the benchmarks on ALL of the operating > systems. >=20 Wow, the difference between the FreeBSDs and Linux performance is amazing a= nd for those looking at the first time on such benchmarks not knowing much about the tur= bo boost issue one would definitely choose the faster one :-( I'd appreciate results of a benchmark considering no boost and with a light= sched on the scheduler (doesn't Linux have a very sophisticated scheduler dealing/scalin= g very efficient with lots of threads/cpu cores? This could also be a very interes= ting benchmark pointing to AMDs new Epyc platform comprised also from lots of cpu cores). Kind regards, oh --=20 O. Hartmann Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder =C3=9Cbermittlung meiner Daten f=C3=BCr Werbezwecke oder f=C3=BCr die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (=C2=A7 28 Abs.= 4 BDSG). --Sig_/rePbvxrMaFY+S1D=Uv52lqZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iLUEARMKAB0WIQQZVZMzAtwC2T/86TrS528fyFhYlAUCWdtJMAAKCRDS528fyFhY lBZzAfsEJ6NkrtoNOZsiEcmDsws74dxyg9yuio7FvGr4DzsMnzGSOtK48KDfqmDh 2oMLi0+sH3JWALlGjmmVC65Ab+ZIAgCL7Q9NaV84SwfnQVdK2olORJLEQgkVHXoA j+8dPMl7uel2aJUmSbDiRiASsRXydb6viKRnonBZpvdiwHfsmBfW =3jrZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/rePbvxrMaFY+S1D=Uv52lqZ--