From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jul 7 8: 4:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C5437C740 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:04:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id AAA12856; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 00:04:32 +0900 (JST) To: Len Conrad Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: lconrad's message of Fri, 07 Jul 2000 16:45:50 +0200. <4.3.2.7.2.20000707162836.03d4ead0@mail.Go2France.com> X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: KAME stable 20000704 From: itojun@iijlab.net Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 00:04:32 +0900 Message-ID: <12854.962982272@coconut.itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Are there any hardware-encryption boards for KAME or OpenSSL? >We've been talking to some large accounts that have evaluated variouis VPN >solutions and had concluded that software-only VPN's just can't keep up >with large number of simultaneous tunnels. They told us some Cisco box >with hardware-encryption had the best comfort level. no (not at this moment). openbsd has *tremendous* support for hardware-encryption enabled ipsec. not sure if the supported card is sold outside of the US. KAME intends to do it, though, it is a major problem to tackle. itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message