From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 24 15:30:14 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA24664 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 24 Mar 1995 15:30:14 -0800 Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.20.4]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id PAA24658; Fri, 24 Mar 1995 15:30:12 -0800 Received: by brasil.moneng.mei.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA16496; Fri, 24 Mar 95 17:29:39 CST From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <9503242329.AA16496@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system. To: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 1995 17:29:38 -0600 (CST) Cc: hackers@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <19824.796077849@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Mar 24, 95 12:44:09 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4beta PL9] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 877 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi Jordan, > I *know* that these are both ports, I'm simply proposing that we raise > the status of both to "standard component" status. I sorta agree - I find myself installing these packages constantly, too. I'd also like to see a prototype /var/spool/ftp area included, and perhaps wuftpd (I volunteer to engineer the former if need be)... > Other than screams of "bloat! bloat!", any comments? How about an "Advanced network services" option? Include things like httpd, gopher/d, archie, lynx, gated, et al. This way we would not be reducing the default functionality, but those of us who use FreeBSD as network service platforms would be quite thrilled. ... Joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Greco - Systems Administrator jgreco@ns.sol.net Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI 414/342-4847