From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Mar 30 14:15:04 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAB45C77B5 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:15:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@geeks.org) Received: from mail.geeks.org (mail.geeks.org [IPv6:2001:4980:3333:1::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F8s0R42cTz4m7g for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@geeks.org) Received: from mail.geeks.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by after-clamsmtpd.geeks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D710ADE0 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:14:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mail.geeks.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 6914EADDF; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:14:56 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:14:56 -0500 From: Doug McIntyre To: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update Message-ID: References: <6c3da6ff-d102-b2d9-5433-4dac4116d27f@osfux.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <6c3da6ff-d102-b2d9-5433-4dac4116d27f@osfux.nl> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4F8s0R42cTz4m7g X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of merlyn@geeks.org designates 2001:4980:3333:1::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=merlyn@geeks.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.30 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2001:4980:3333:1::1:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[geeks.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2001:4980:3333:1::1:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7753, ipnet:2001:4980::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-stable] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:15:04 -0000 Like the patch referenced in the SA. https://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-21:07/openssl-12.patch Again, it seems like confusion over what happens in RELEASE, STABLE and CURRENT.. On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 04:05:32PM +0200, Ruben via freebsd-stable wrote: > Hi, > > Did you mean 12.1-p5 or 12.2-p5 ? I'm asking because you refer to both > 12.1-p5 and 12.2-p5 (typo?). > > If you meant 12.2-p5: Perhaps the FreeBSD security team did not bump the > version, but "only" backported the patches to version 1.1.1h ? > > Regards, > > Ruben > > > On 3/30/21 3:35 PM, tech-lists wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Recently there was > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html > > about openssl. Upgraded to 12.2-p5 with freebsd-update and rebooted. > > > > What I'm unsure about is the openssl version. > > Up-to-date 12.1-p5 instances report OpenSSL 1.1.1h-freebsd  22 Sep 2020 > > > > Up-to-date stable/13-n245043-7590d7800c4 reports OpenSSL 1.1.1k-freebsd > > 25 Mar 2021 > > > > shouldn't the 12.2-p5 be reporting openssl 1.1.1k-freebsd as well? > > > > thanks, > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"