Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 20:29:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: Nguyen Tam Chinh <unixvn@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: UFS2 optimization for many small files Message-ID: <20070701202758.B64116@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20070630235127.GX15680@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <64b284310706270311j2a6af2f6i6766b483a4b66a5c@mail.gmail.com> <20070630235127.GX15680@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I have tried using a 4K/0.5K UFS1 filesystem in the past and found the > performance was very poor. UFS2 was based on 16K/2K and I would expect > it to perform even worse with 4K/0.5K. I would suggest you try 8K/1K. > not for small files. you are light with large files but it's not THAT bad as you say. i reagularly use 4K/0.5 UFS but not for everything if i require good fast speed for big files. for really big files i make 32/4 filesystem with very little inodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070701202758.B64116>