From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 29 02:58:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5AF16A403 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 02:58:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1819E43DA1 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 02:58:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350312919ED; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:58:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25289-03; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 02:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-7-151-244.eastlink.ca [71.7.151.244]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2D6291987; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:58:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1027) id 4CD7D49302; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:58:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4926C489F0; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:58:17 -0300 (ADT) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:58:17 -0300 (ADT) From: User Freebsd To: Atanas In-Reply-To: <44A3394C.4090209@asd.aplus.net> Message-ID: <20060628235751.J1229@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060628185426.M43909@ganymede.hub.org> <20060628225239.GA93265@dan.emsphone.com> <44A3394C.4090209@asd.aplus.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em device hangs on ifconfig alias ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 02:58:22 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Atanas wrote: > I have some newer machines with 2 Broadcom chips on-board. I plan to > give them a try at some point in the future, but I'm not sure how stable > the bge driver is when compared to fxp and em. I'm using the bge driver on our new HP servers, and haven't noticed any problems with them to date ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664