From owner-freebsd-doc Sun Jun 2 18:45:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CF537B426; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 18:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020603014508.GZUV29266.sccrmhc01.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 01:45:08 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g531j8fs045430; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 18:45:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g531j7VY045429; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 18:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200206030145.g531j7VY045429@intruder.bmah.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Alexey Zelkin Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" , doc@FreeBSD.org, nik@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/common new.sgml In-reply-to: <20020601183147.C55534@ark.cris.net> References: <200205302048.g4UKmDh27423@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020531121313.A20879@ark.cris.net> <200205311443.g4VEhUPi002113@intruder.bmah.org> <20020601183147.C55534@ark.cris.net> Comments: In-reply-to Alexey Zelkin message dated "Sat, 01 Jun 2002 18:31:47 +0300." From: bmah@FreeBSD.org (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.org X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 18:45:07 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org If memory serves me right, Alexey Zelkin wrote: > > (It used to be that all versions of the release notes referenced the > > manpages for the most recent release. Clearly that doesn't work.) > Currently no, but who can stop you from modifying existing DSL to make > it reality ? [patch snipped] Hmmm...interesting! This patch not only changes the DSL (which is fine), but it introduces a new element in the DTD (which I have a problem with). The longcitrefentry element is something that would only exist on FreeBSD, and nowhere else, making us (in yet another way) different from any other DocBook-using project. There's some precedent for trying to avoid this; we got rid of the element some months ago for exactly this reason. Don't get me wrong...I am in agreement with you that there's a bit of an odd situation. I am just not crazy about the proposed solution...unfortunately I don't have any better ideas at the moment! Other thoughts? Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message