From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Mon May 28 19:45:58 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74351F7BC2C; Mon, 28 May 2018 19:45:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15097E7D1; Mon, 28 May 2018 19:45:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Received: from yv.noip.me (c-24-4-131-132.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.131.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id w4SJjuEq068023 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 28 May 2018 12:45:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-24-4-131-132.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.131.132] claimed to be yv.noip.me Reply-To: yuri@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r471061 - head/audio/qjackctl To: Sean Bruno , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201805281845.w4SIj8bO065379@repo.freebsd.org> <985846ee-dce7-d8f1-2813-0a28bc36217e@freebsd.org> <5dddd567-3439-caa3-56d0-665a40bdbf35@freebsd.org> <77503afc-b631-ac32-a87b-c8a28e0bb2ab@freebsd.org> From: Yuri Message-ID: <0cd44f35-c134-f143-b4e6-56b816f4938f@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 12:45:55 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 19:45:58 -0000 On 05/28/18 12:35, Sean Bruno wrote: > I didn't know I was complaining. I thought I was asking about a change > you made and trying to engage in a civil conversation about it. I didn't mean to use the word "complaining" in an uncivilized way. :-) I just meant that I didn't see anybody to express such opinion before. > This happens quite a lot actually. I don't find this argument valid. > Is there information from Portmgr or the team that maintains/works on QT > saying that QT4 is going to be deprecated? I couldn't find one if it > exists. It seems reasonable to me to delete the option, it doesn't seem reasonable to you. Let portmgr decide what should happen in this case. :-) Yuri