Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:12:17 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> Cc: bf1783@gmail.com, Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd.gcc.mk PREFIX or LOCALBASE? Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.1.99.1002150210100.21091@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002141533560.30651@pragry.qngnvk.ybpny> References: <d873d5be1002130008k2ea4a8d8tf7078a22f97bb9d9@mail.gmail.com> <b025ceb71002131847w6a925c1i2527493cea20c7d5@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002141533560.30651@pragry.qngnvk.ybpny>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, jhell wrote:
> Could this possibly be the cause of the samba3* and cups ports getting
> profiling enabled on them ? possibly others ?
I don't think the the use of ${PREFIX} versus ${LOCALBASE} can have
such an effect, and by default (and thus the vast majority of uses)
the two are set to the same value.
Gerald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LSU.1.99.1002150210100.21091>