Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 01:45:04 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.freebsd.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ssh + compiled-in SKEY support considered harmful? Message-ID: <20020423004504.GA45021@genius.tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200204230039.g3N0dQ8i011313@winston.freebsd.org> References: <200204230039.g3N0dQ8i011313@winston.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:39:26PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: >=20 > My question: Who's "wrong" here, FreeBSD or Mac OS X? If the latter, > why doesn't Linux or anything else produce this problem? I ask now > because I know that the usage of Mac OS X is growing and there are going > to be a lot of annoyed users (like me!) who very quickly get tired > of having to wind through all the bogus S/Key password prompts before > they can actually type in their real password (and no, skey is not > enabled on winston and I have never done a keyinit operation, so I couldn= 't > S/Key authenticate to it if I wanted to). >=20 I got it sshing from -current to a freshly installed 4.5 box and it continued to happen when I upgraded the 4.5 box to 5.0-DP1. It doesn't happen when I ssh to my regular -stable server, but I've not investigated the reasons why. Joe --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjzEro8ACgkQXVIcjOaxUBZQ9ACeONvFxhQQm7kkcNWrB0+HGR8F MTcAoJ5l8O0Rs+RKd2ImaiIQcMWvWwnU =jHxj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020423004504.GA45021>