From owner-freebsd-net Fri May 25 23:46:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from superconductor.rush.net (superconductor.rush.net [208.9.155.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2C837B423 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 23:46:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@superconductor.rush.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by superconductor.rush.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f4Q6kkA29195; Sat, 26 May 2001 02:46:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 02:46:44 -0400 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Kris Kennaway Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Randomized IP ID patch Message-ID: <20010526024644.I17514@superconductor.rush.net> References: <20010525233811.A44455@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0us In-Reply-To: <20010525233811.A44455@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 11:38:12PM -0700 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Kris Kennaway [010526 02:38] wrote: > A while back I posted a version of this which was activated by sysctl, > but people didn't like the per-packet performance overhead, so here's > an updated version which uses a compile-time option. Please review; > I'd like to commit this soon. > This seems pretty cool, I'm suprised you had people objecting to a single check of whether or not to run an external function. (I'd rather see this configurable while the system is running). -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message