From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 15 12:53:50 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754F310656AA;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:53:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from arundel@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9488FC08;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:53:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1FCron9076077;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:53:50 GMT
	(envelope-from arundel@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from arundel@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p1FCroq9076073;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:53:50 GMT (envelope-from arundel)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:53:50 GMT
Message-Id: <201102151253.p1FCroq9076073@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: swear@blarg.net, arundel@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: arundel@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: gnu/36460: cu(1) program does not work very well.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:53:50 -0000

Synopsis: cu(1) program does not work very well.

State-Changed-From-To: suspended->closed
State-Changed-By: arundel
State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 15 12:49:24 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why: 
No point in keeping this in suspend state. The PR doesn't describe a specific
issue with cu(1). Also the term "This program does not work very well." no
longer exists in the cu(1) manual. This doesn't mean that cu(1) has become a
masterpiece of software engneering since 2002, however any spcific issues with
it should be submitted seperately rather than keeping this PR around.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=36460