From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 7 02:02:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC4916A4CE; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 02:02:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AF943D2F; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 02:02:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) i67201vF048832; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 22:00:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: <200407062057.57340.linimon@lonesome.com> References: <200407070142.i671gGCh097568@freefall.freebsd.org> <1089164894.77519.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200407062057.57340.linimon@lonesome.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HXtcgcVZpvGtzRsR6bsa" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1089165749.77519.42.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 22:02:30 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org cc: Joseph Koshy Subject: Re: ports/68747: [patch] upgrade print/freetype2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 02:02:34 -0000 --=-HXtcgcVZpvGtzRsR6bsa Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 21:57, Mark Linimon wrote: > May I suggest that we hold off on this for a few days while we try to > work on the regression testing for the meta-X-upgrade stuff? It's just > one more variable and there are plenty already :-) Yeah, no problem. I have to verify this myself. Like I said, 2.1.8 would have earned me much flamage. Joe >=20 > mcl --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-HXtcgcVZpvGtzRsR6bsa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBA61m1b2iPiv4Uz4cRAt+OAJ9yIjvhtnjgjntjQaHHsRDR/q0fFgCgo5e9 qw8c40OgwaZYobSN8+zbkAE= =AAMA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HXtcgcVZpvGtzRsR6bsa--