From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org  Tue Jul 14 15:06:32 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371DC9A1608
 for <freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:06:32 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org)
Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org
 (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F910926
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:06:32 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org)
Received: by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346)
 id 1C70F1FF0; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:06:32 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:06:32 +0000
To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
From: "onwahe-gmail-com (Svatopluk Kraus)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org>
Reply-to: D3034+327+45b7a5c19a24c07f@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D3034: Add BUS_UNMASK_INTR method
Message-ID: <f02d40426c114670fdee0c0374d8508d@localhost.localdomain>
X-Priority: 3
Thread-Topic: D3034: Add BUS_UNMASK_INTR method
X-Herald-Rules: <28>, <31>, <32>, <34>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-u7g3pamdppe4sw6i6zt6>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-axkijn4pfdxlezgbnt7g>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-q5lmute3rwskeizvu5gf>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-yhwnadxnjthofqelhkdx>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-pns6zgllnr6ze4h7ms3o>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-6m5mo2kjikkzyd33ld4n>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-xvjulcphpj66vffzpxft>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-wjsgsqx4il4yblud7x6c>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-ueipubl3jymguf56hiqy>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-q5lmute3rwskeizvu5gf>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-pns6zgllnr6ze4h7ms3o>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-axkijn4pfdxlezgbnt7g>
In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-knxjlihey7dhpvtvtsyg-req@FreeBSD.org>
References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-knxjlihey7dhpvtvtsyg-req@FreeBSD.org>
Thread-Index: Njk5OTUyY2Q2NjQxNGE1MDJhNmZkNGQ3MjI0IFWlJXg=
Precedence: bulk
X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes
X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: <differential-cc>, <differential-comment>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:06:32 -0000

onwahe-gmail-com added a subscriber: onwahe-gmail-com.
onwahe-gmail-com added a comment.

Well, I do not like to change bus interface so fast. What about to think of PPI on each core like separate interrupt with its irq number, counter, handler, and handler argument. This way bus_setup_intr will be called only once for PPI on each core.  Of course, some coding is needed in nexus and/or interrupt framework.

Sadly, there is a new interrupt framework waiting for review for long time. Thus, this thing could be already discussed without such hurry.


REPOSITORY
  rS FreeBSD src repository

REVISION DETAIL
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3034

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: wma_semihalf.com, emaste, imp, ian, andrew, zbb
Cc: onwahe-gmail-com, freebsd-arm-list, meloun-miracle-cz, imp, andrew, emaste