Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:06:32 +0000 From: "onwahe-gmail-com (Svatopluk Kraus)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D3034: Add BUS_UNMASK_INTR method Message-ID: <f02d40426c114670fdee0c0374d8508d@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-knxjlihey7dhpvtvtsyg-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-knxjlihey7dhpvtvtsyg-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
onwahe-gmail-com added a subscriber: onwahe-gmail-com. onwahe-gmail-com added a comment. Well, I do not like to change bus interface so fast. What about to think of PPI on each core like separate interrupt with its irq number, counter, handler, and handler argument. This way bus_setup_intr will be called only once for PPI on each core. Of course, some coding is needed in nexus and/or interrupt framework. Sadly, there is a new interrupt framework waiting for review for long time. Thus, this thing could be already discussed without such hurry. REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3034 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: wma_semihalf.com, emaste, imp, ian, andrew, zbb Cc: onwahe-gmail-com, freebsd-arm-list, meloun-miracle-cz, imp, andrew, emaste
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f02d40426c114670fdee0c0374d8508d>