From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 5 02:07:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: perl@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C27CEA92 for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 02:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AE5B1625 for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 02:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qkgx75 with SMTP id x75so97876518qkg.1 for ; Mon, 04 May 2015 19:07:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=A7m1Vq/rtaH1bJMRMoHoxU1RPXwfpmjJ0YLGC9UXdH0=; b=lhgGEXL6sNBUFqYJSO0LRehyBymo13CyJ8/G3ouN8hpt5iLpJ6ui5Ve8qMBZelJxLg tx3xx/v4L23w4RanI0iriOfnybTzhEqvx/fGK6qf9q/8FTJpZmW6X7GUHQfNjeV9LiO6 jId7aztjkWhdjEOZ0mk8WPnChALwWVWh3wKl3QKCQSFMATttZ5Zndlu/qgqy7zrkDeWb fM+B5YopqwPfDoXFDQfEHLJa4I/Z2WJjxTSDyHJZGYujI69bqWhd0vCahDCtHDGkyGXF HzCTcZe2FvEl52sQ7/vBPCnpwMwtuKop/BnqONIML/MoVX7Ipcvfr9c50yTLtX1034Ms qMUA== X-Received: by 10.55.33.142 with SMTP id f14mr51878789qki.1.1430791666516; Mon, 04 May 2015 19:07:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (207-38-234-77.c3-0.43d-ubr2.qens-43d.ny.cable.rcn.com. [207.38.234.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 202sm26320272qhg.16.2015.05.04.19.07.45 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 May 2015 19:07:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Steven Kreuzer Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 02:07:44 +0000 From: Steven Kreuzer To: Adam Weinberger Cc: perl@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Unmaintained perl ports Message-ID: <20150505020744.GA15524@gmail.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 02:07:47 -0000 --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 09:21:54AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > I was thinking about assigning those modules to perl@. What do you think of > that idea? Do you mean ports@? If so, I think that makes sense since someone is more likely do adopt a port if the maintainer is set to ports@. When I see a module set to perl@ it makes me think that it is actively maintained by the perl team --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVSCXrAAoJEPUoFYRZ1x7npV0IAIxyUVUQ2xhyLgdFFIyERT0K BmVZbixXhLS6tC8l7JSIxIfl5BuLNvZhIGr/B862agmDVX9PiZn6dahomPDS522f i0sS8QB040zfKgIQxLVWZUI7BRDQYC5QMgFystAl8HHYrJysYbcnf3ymj6cly9mV tG/5Iu3L2UVyvFBHckmuVlj5lkY6zy6nR8Ws3HVe0i7BpwyVgs60g0yU+z9yWctc 9s3T4szffammp3pLRmvybxM60pC3hubV/V1jHjt1a6zwosGtBtJeidrOo3TRX5nR pynfQYaealZ6Z0Ecbku3hZQlqid5354Gf1cNZ5+5tZ0esukwyRjPOwZlW6cpnXs= =hHXX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C--