From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 07:01:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5873116A419; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:01:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from galain.elvandar.org (galain.elvandar.org [217.148.169.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD5D13C465; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:01:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from localhost.we-dare.net ([127.0.0.1] helo=galain.elvandar.org) by galain.elvandar.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JFOV7-0005cq-45; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:45:21 +0100 Received: from 194.74.82.3 (SquirrelMail authenticated user remko) by galain.elvandar.org with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:45:21 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47849.194.74.82.3.1200552321.squirrel@galain.elvandar.org> In-Reply-To: <2a7894eb0801162124x76d7132y8de9f4a1d314d8aa@mail.gmail.com> References: <2a7894eb0801162124x76d7132y8de9f4a1d314d8aa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:45:21 +0100 (CET) From: "Remko Lodder" To: "Murray Stokely" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: doceng@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docproj port needs to use tidy-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: remko@elvandar.org List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:01:05 -0000 On Thu, January 17, 2008 6:24 am, Murray Stokely wrote: > Is there any reason not to update the docproj port to use tidy-devel > rather > than tidy? The released version of tidy is nearly 8 years old and > produces > xhtml that doesn't validate. The newer -devel releases produce more > correct > xhtml. > - Murray > > I think the problem at some point was that tidy-devel was a 'quick' moving target which got updated often and is missing a few things that we would like to have included in the tidy we use (Certain flags, but I cannot recall which of them exactly), I recall speaking with Hiroki about this (if I remember this correctly; it was more then 1.5years ago at least :-)) Note that I would also like to see that we use tidy-devel instead of tidy... :-) Cheers remko -- /"\ Best regards, | remko@FreeBSD.org \ / Remko Lodder | remko@EFnet X http://www.evilcoder.org/ | / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News