From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 2 12:31:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D0816A4CE; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.mcneil.com (rrcs-west-24-199-45-54.biz.rr.com [24.199.45.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F22043D2F; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:31:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69428FD03A; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:31:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.mcneil.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 64856-07; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:31:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.199.45.54] (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21B8FD020; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:31:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean McNeil To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <1086204118.514.11.camel@gyros> References: <1086203721.60191.2.camel@server.mcneil.com> <1086204118.514.11.camel@gyros> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1086204706.60191.8.camel@server.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 12:31:46 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mcneil.com cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: backtrace of nautilus core dump on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 19:31:45 -0000 On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 12:21, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 15:15, Sean McNeil wrote: > > Here is a core dump of nautilus. The only interesting difference in my > > environment is that I use ldap/nss_ldap. Other than that, everything > > should be just like everyone else: > > There are no symbols in this backtrace. Please recompile everything > with debugging flags. Also, try disabling nss_ldap, and see if it makes > a difference. > > Joe Tried with nss_ldap disabled. Same core. Mezz just sent me a comment to do: CFLAGS= -O -pipe -g STRIP= I usually do DEBUG_FLAGS=-g WITH_DEBUG=yes Are they both as good, should I do as Mezz suggests? I just started a portupgrade -fR on nautilus. Please let me know if I should stop it and do the build with the CFLAGS/STRIP assignment. Cheers, Sean