From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Sep 22 08:02:46 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA17677
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 08:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ohm.ingsala.unal.edu.co ([168.176.15.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA17552
          for <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 08:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unalmodem.usc.unal.edu.co (unalmodem09.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.39])
	by ohm.ingsala.unal.edu.co (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA29410
	for <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 09:31:38 -0500 (COT)
Message-ID: <3425BFA4.796@asme.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 17:45:24 -0700
From: "Pedro Giffuni S," <giffunip@asme.org>
Organization: Universidad Nacional de Colombia
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold [it] (Win16; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Making ports
References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970921134629.24355L-100000@Journey2.mat.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Chuck Robey wrote:
> 
> Right here is a good place.  Why don't yo do it now?
> 
Well...I can't complain as my ports usually get committed very fast
(thanks guys),....but I would like to see VRweb (VRML browser) and
ifmail (Fidonet mailer, lying there since ages) committed before the
next release, qmail (sendmail replacement) would also be good for
security reasons.

I agree with Chuck, a good description usually makes the difference
between a PR and a committed port. So be cool...exaggerate! ;-)

	Pedro.