From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 4 19:46:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D260F1065672 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:46:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utf128@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C50F8FC08 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so8361311fxm.13 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:46:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TsQbtzmS1lJ0hLgKhRp/UXvycdPh8zQJAkHkStvcw6c=; b=QQVllZ1vi93azP11PTG1h5FciVL645AHLAEEAnHN7F7yMVen116QUis8/GEJGbFJrs SL4C2rbeLvZWaoUO49kPQIZFDqjIy8lszN7YSIBWep5dsc7zHMGU6vB9Y9dGEZ66cISP ulPMjJ1SzPW+HobDOvO/cPymAnCpb6BCruN44= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tla26/z7XMn5GkkiHZARjYqqSkc5o2WuD91+MHbe6wcnwC71iFQ1jh4/KG45txo4qi epoOPRDOSI3ddn9idrO3ZQ97dbUW70ow9Qvl52E9mPKwFT9bnQOpiAtzkBKVZ/XfPNKv CQwfVeapEgbgXUasFdGlqmKmDb0Fsyi5VgWlA= Received: by 10.223.125.132 with SMTP id y4mr2807874far.148.1291491965068; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:46:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.4.14] (dslb-084-063-095-184.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.63.95.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n2sm919598fam.4.2010.12.04.11.46.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:46:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CFA9A79.8050709@googlemail.com> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:46:01 +0100 From: Michael Schaefer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100708 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> FreeBSD Questions" References: <4CFA7576.6010002@googlemail.com> <4CFA945F.70708@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <4CFA945F.70708@sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: massive hdd/geli problems after upgrade to 8.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:46:07 -0000 Hi Mike and thank you for your response please find the smartctl output here: http://pastecode.org/index.php/view/27349679 will do the atacontrol comparison later on since I would ahve to upgrade the system again. I stressed the hdd now with the old kernel for several hours copying reading/writing large amounts of data without any error. even the filesystem check ran through with just some softupdate inconsistencies but without sector errors... don't know what to think about all this.. Well maybe I should mention that I formatted the hard disk according to this discussion http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=12088&page=3 aligned with the 4k sector size of the drive... regards Michael On 04.12.2010 20:19, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 12/4/2010 12:08 PM, Michael Schaefer wrote: >> >> ad4: FAILURE - READ_MUL48 status=51 error=84 >> LBA=594632984 > > Those do seem like hardware errors on the disk. But going back to the > old kernel however should not make a difference. Try > (/usr/ports/sysutiles/smartmontools and do a > smartctl -x /dev/ad4 > and see if the drive thinks it has any errors. Does > atacontrol cap ad4 > show any differences between the two kernels ? > > perhaps something new is enabled or disabled between versions like the > power management ? > > ---Mike