Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 19:05:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/gcc41/files patch-c-decl.c ports/lang/gcc34/files patch-c-decl.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0509081903360.83804@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <200509071015.j87AF8Ew012882@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200509071015.j87AF8Ew012882@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, David E. O'Brien wrote: > Added files: > lang/gcc41/files patch-c-decl.c > lang/gcc34/files patch-c-decl.c > Log: > Fix bug where static forward declarations weren't accepted. > This allows us to fix non-ISO-C constructs in our kernel to legal ISO-C. > > Submitted by: rodrigc > Obtained from: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-09/msg00006.html > > Revision Changes Path > 1.1 +16 -0 ports/lang/gcc34/files/patch-c-decl.c (new) > 1.1 +16 -0 ports/lang/gcc41/files/patch-c-decl.c (new) Why only gcc34 and gcc41, but not gcc40? And why the hurry? Once this gets upstream, we'll import this with the (nearly) weekly update I usually perform anyways. Gerald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.62.0509081903360.83804>