From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 10 22:54:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647F0106568B for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from samankaya@netscape.net) Received: from imr-da05.mx.aol.com (imr-da05.mx.aol.com [205.188.105.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257B78FC08 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imo-da01.mx.aol.com (imo-da01.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.199]) by imr-da05.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o0AMsFC4028735; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:54:15 -0500 Received: from samankaya@netscape.net by imo-da01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id o.d50.6517a103 (43905); Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:54:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.16.1.52] (mail.reformkurumsal.com [212.156.209.87]) by cia-dc07.mx.aol.com (v127.7) with ESMTP id MAILCIADC072-ab814b4a5a9033f; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:54:10 -0500 Message-ID: <4B4A5A88.4050108@netscape.net> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:54:00 +0200 From: Kaya Saman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090323) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glen Barber References: <4B4A422F.9060307@netscape.net> <4B4A4DF3.5010509@quip.cz> <20100110222638.GA5300@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20100110222638.GA5300@orion.hsd1.pa.comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AOL-IP: 212.156.209.87 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) X-Spam-Flag: NO X-AOL-SENDER: samankaya@netscape.net Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using 'Jails' like Solaris Zones?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:54:36 -0000 > > As of 7.2, jails can be bound directly to a specific interface. > > The example in /etc/defaults/rc.conf shows: > > #jail_example_interface="" > > > > Oh wow.... ok; this means that I can use Jails similarly to how I was going to use the Solaris Zone! No need for Solaris then and also I think that BSD is lighter on systems then Solaris in general. Ok now that ZFS is in place no contest, but before when using UFS v.1 I think BSD still gives better performance in terms of freer system resources.