From owner-cvs-all Tue Jan 22 13:31:37 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from alcatraz.iptelecom.net.ua (alcatraz.iptelecom.net.ua [212.9.224.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B10237B417; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:31:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipcard.iptcom.net (ipcard.iptcom.net [212.9.224.5]) by alcatraz.iptelecom.net.ua (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA59340; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:30:53 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from vega.vega.com (h163.234.dialup.iptcom.net [212.9.234.163]) by ipcard.iptcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA26951; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:30:51 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vega.vega.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g0MLUJI22394; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:30:19 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3C4DDA1F.622EAD6F@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:31:11 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Andrews Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/evolution pkg-plist ports/mail/evolution/files patch-ac patch-camel::providers::local::Makefile.in patch-camel::providers::nntp::Makefile.in patch-camel::providers::pop3::Makefile.in patch-camel::providers::sendmail::Makefile.in patch-camel::providers::smtp::Makefile.in patch-mail::importers::Makefile.in References: <200201222039.g0MKdcm91935@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020122154603.H18609@squall.waterspout.com> <3C4DD282.A1FA297C@FreeBSD.org> <20020122160948.I18609@squall.waterspout.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Will Andrews wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 10:58:42PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Names are auto-generated, so I don't really care. > > They might affect some things, like the cpio bug that someone > reported to Murray last week. And they're unsightly... you > should fix your script so it optimizes the name lengths. Well, the idea behind those sometimes long names is that there is always 1:1 mapping between the file in port and corresponding patchfile, so that the history is automagically preserved (no need to look at logs as with old patch-xy scheme) even if you will delete patchfile at some point and put it back later. No form of "optimization" could gurantee that, and just stripping several levels of hierarchy is the worst optimization possible. If I ever go that way I'd just replace those long strings with md5 hash of the path relative to ${WRKSRC} - this at least would minimize likelyhood of collision. > > Well, considering that those patches are to be submitted back to > > developers this isn't a good idea either. > > They're the same thing. Just one gets the message across a lot > more concisely. That's your opinion. :) -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message