Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 May 1999 08:09:17 -0600
From:      Matt Meola <mmeola@uswest.com>
To:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, mmeola@lookout.uswc.uswest.com
Subject:   Re: Do you need editors/xemacs{,20} (Re: pending/11618: new port: editors/xemacs21) 
Message-ID:  <199905181409.IAA16172@ima2wk6.uswc.uswest.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.10.9905181711220.10449-100000@bragg> 
References:  <Pine.OSF.4.10.9905181711220.10449-100000@bragg> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I agree with Kris -- editors/xemacs actually ought to be XEmacs v20.4; 
but it would be nice to have XEmacs 21-b67 brought in.  I have found 
the v21 beta to be quite stable under Solaris...





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905181409.IAA16172>