From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 31 17:46:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73B0106564A for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:46:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from nlpi025.prodigy.net (nlpi025.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.36.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6848FC16 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:46:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from [10.0.5.18] (ppp-71-139-9-70.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [71.139.9.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by nlpi025.prodigy.net (8.13.8 smtpauth/dk/map_regex/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBVHk7SQ031190; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:46:08 -0600 Message-ID: <495BAFE0.3070800@root.org> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:46:08 -0800 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Volker References: <495B1C8A.7000808@gmail.com> <495B6430.8060405@vwsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <495B6430.8060405@vwsoft.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Implementation of AcpiOsDerivePciId X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:46:10 -0000 Volker wrote: > On 12/23/-58 20:59, GiuseppeBonfa wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> My first post on ACPI-ML so I hope to be quite rigth, if not please >> excuse my OT. >> >> By visiting ACPI Project Page I've seen that AcpiOsDerivePciId has not a >> right implementation, my question is, can you please direct/point me to >> some coder? I'm working on a new version of AcpiOsDerivePciId so I need >> to know some Prj Person to submit my work. >> >> Have a nice Day and an Happy New Year! >> Giuseppe 'Evilcry' Bonfa' > > Giuseppe, > > we do not make any deals in mystical dark rooms or at the backdoor. > > The official way for non-committers is to file a PR and attach patches. > I suggest you to discuss your findings first in our fine mailing lists > and have your proposed changes being validated first. This raises the > chances for your PR not to die old in GNATS. Correct. Post a link to the patches here and ask any questions. Then if it's ready to commit, throw it into the PR. -- Nate