From owner-freebsd-net Sun Nov 4 16:18:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [216.33.66.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E1C37B405 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 16:18:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1098) id C7E8981D07; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 18:18:12 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 18:18:12 -0600 From: Bill Fumerola To: "irado@nettaxi.com" Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dummynet (user confused) Message-ID: <20011104181812.R51024@elvis.mu.org> References: <200111041206.fA4C6c614801@mail2.bigmailbox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200111041206.fA4C6c614801@mail2.bigmailbox.com>; from irado@nettaxi.com on Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 04:06:38AM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.4-FEARSOME-20010909 i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 04:06:38AM -0800, irado@nettaxi.com wrote: > > I am somewhat confuse on *how* to really use dummynet for bandwidth limitation. > > Im my (mis)understanding, ipfw functions act in a 'hit and run' way, > say: the first one which corresponds to 'this' packet will be the only > to be followed, there are no new verification on this packet with the > next rule. you need to change the sysctl 'net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass'. see ipfw(8). -- - bill fumerola / fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org / billf@mu.org - my anger management counselor can beat up your self-affirmation therapist To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message