From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 17 20:48:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61399106568A for ; Sat, 17 May 2008 20:48:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from root.org (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9738FC29 for ; Sat, 17 May 2008 20:48:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: (qmail 52475 invoked from network); 17 May 2008 20:48:52 -0000 Received: from ppp-71-139-8-158.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO ?10.0.5.18?) (nate-mail@71.139.8.158) by root.org with ESMTPA; 17 May 2008 20:48:52 -0000 Message-ID: <482F44AC.1010904@root.org> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 13:48:44 -0700 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sean Bruno References: <482E1895.3000700@cis.rit.edu> <482F1482.6060105@miralink.com> In-Reply-To: <482F1482.6060105@miralink.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Rui Paulo , freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update on T42p with FreeBSD-7.0 and ACPI X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 20:48:52 -0000 Sean Bruno wrote: > Bob Krzaczek wrote: >> Following some extremely helpful advice from Tobias Roth, I've moved >> from RELEASE to STABLE, and I'm happy to say that the laptop is so >> much better behaved with suspend/resume logic. >> >> One anomaly: /etc/rc.suspend is still not running. This turns out to >> be harmless in my particular case. However, I've verified first hand >> that Mitsuru IWASAKI's patch will take care of this. >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi/2008-April/004806.html >> >> Anyway, thanks again for the fast and responsive feedback, folks. >> This is getting much more stable and useful, now. >> >> Cheers, >> Bob >> > Hrm...Is there a PR somewhere on this issue? Or, more importantly, has > a committer accepted the patch? Iwasaki-san's patch should be committed. Rui? -- Nate