Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:46:27 -0800 From: Vadim Kurland /r/ <vadim@vk.crocodile.org> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> Cc: FreeBSD Ports List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problems building fwbuilder port Message-ID: <87DB833D-3B3B-11D8-8D08-000393B66A20@vk.crocodile.org> In-Reply-To: <3FF23351.2040907@ciam.ru> References: <20031230045520.GA23303@teddy.fas.com> <C8E151FB-3AE8-11D8-8D08-000393B66A20@vk.crocodile.org> <3FF23351.2040907@ciam.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 30, 2003, at 6:24 PM, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Vadim Kurland wrote: >> Actually, I'd like to ask port gurus what would be the best Makefile >> target to run aclocal ? I need to run aclocal when source tree is >> already extracted and after dependencies listed in "BUILD_DEPENDS" >> have been checked but before "configure". I am using "post-extract", >> but obviously BUILD_DEPENDS has not been consulted yet when this >> target is used. > > Why don't you like pre-configure target? > I like it very much :-) I need to doublecheck, but I recall I had problems with it because at the point when I run aclocal, the configure script does not exist yet. I run aclocal _and_ autoconf to regenerate it. I think I was getting an error because configure wasn't there. I need to try it again though. --------------------------------------------------------- Firewall Builder: http://www.fwbuilder.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87DB833D-3B3B-11D8-8D08-000393B66A20>