From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 17 21:32:23 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB8F16A418
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:32:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lists@webtent.net)
Received: from esmtp.webtent.net (esmtp.webtent.net [208.38.145.5])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2110813C459
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:32:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lists@webtent.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with
	ESMTP id 8135E7FE81; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:32:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from esmtp.webtent.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mx1.webtent.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 49973-04; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:32:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [70.110.70.43] (columbus.webtent.org [70.110.70.43])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with
	ESMTP id B68507FDB9; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:32:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Robert Fitzpatrick <lists@webtent.net>
To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20080117221629.Y5573@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <1200602606.7281.48.camel@columbus.webtent.org>
	<20080117221629.Y5573@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: WebTent Networking, Inc.
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:32:12 -0500
Message-Id: <1200605532.7281.74.camel@columbus.webtent.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: WebTent Mailguard 1.0.2a
Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: db performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert@webtent.com
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:32:23 -0000

On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:17 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > After reading tuning, it suggests the SWAP should be double RAM.
> > According to dmesg...
> 
> installing database on RAID-5 or asking if to add swap (when almost none 
> is used)? what is more stupid? whould we vote?

That was my whole point of showing you the low usage. I take that as a
yes, RAID 1+0 would provide a dramatic difference in speed, thanks!

-- 
Robert