From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 3 20:47:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C792C16A4CE for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:47:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [206.71.64.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B5843D2D for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:47:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.247.57] (helo=[192.168.99.66]) by hobbiton.shire.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.10) id 1Bs6By-0005cb-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 14:47:26 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) In-Reply-To: <55702.81.84.175.12.1090758569.squirrel@81.84.175.12> References: <55702.81.84.175.12.1090758569.squirrel@81.84.175.12> Message-Id: <520BEB45-E58E-11D8-A557-003065A70D30@shire.net> From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:47:23 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on hobbiton.shire.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: jails: am I missing something or.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 20:47:27 -0000 On Jul 25, 2004, at 6:29 AM, Hugo Silva wrote: > It is unthinkable to be umount'ing EVERY jail if I want to add one. > I need separate filesystems for jails if I want (I *need* to) user > quotas > on jails > If I have separate filesystems, I can't create a new jail while the > disk > is being used (ie other jails mount'ed). > > Living with 1 ip? I could do it. Now, this is a major drawback. > > I've been a FreeBSD user for a long time, so I'm hoping there is a > solution to this matter-- (bottom line: working user quotas INSIDE > jails: > need either a way to have them w/ different partitions and be able to > create new jails with all other jails running, or need a way to use > quotas > with only a big partition) I find it weird there exists this big > limitation on the jail system. > try using the mdX memory/file backed file systems for your jails... Works well (though I have not tried the user quota -- you do get separate filesystems) Chad