Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 00:06:10 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: Bernhard =?utf-8?Q?Fr=C3=B6hlich?= <decke@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Fernando =?utf-8?Q?Apestegu=C3=ADa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> Subject: Re: redports.org No address record Message-ID: <86mwt3ieul.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <44k3o78tkg.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> (Lowell Gilbert's message of "Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:58:23 -0400") References: <CAGwOe2ZeF-19Geam=JovJZytcp6LqaMg-KLrL7sLtwOw39CGnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAE-m3X3y-vf2HvXSY6-DF70j5F0HUnDJ-uBbWQ6-CD_5jyE5LA@mail.gmail.com> <44k3o78tkg.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> writes: > Is there some reason proxy support for HTTPS would be particularly > difficult? There's already per-scheme handling for proxies, as I > recall. I could try to make some time to implement this, if it's just=20 > a matter of coding it up. There's already a PR and a patch. I was working on it during Easter, but it got stalled because I had no way to test it, and real life intervened. I just committed it to head (r249431). DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86mwt3ieul.fsf>