Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 06:46:31 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r340970 - head/devel/premake Message-ID: <20140125064631.GA96178@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201401250043.s0P0h0RO021017@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201401250043.s0P0h0RO021017@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:43:00AM +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > New Revision: 340970 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/340970 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r340970/ > > @@ -7,28 +7,24 @@ PORTREVISION= 1 > CATEGORIES= devel > MASTER_SITES= SF/${PORTNAME}/Premake/${PORTVERSION} > DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-src-${PORTVERSION} > +EXTRACT_SUFX= .zip > > MAINTAINER= lippe@FreeBSD.org > COMMENT= Writes build scripts > > +OPTIONS_DEFINE= DOCS This change was not reflected in commit log. > -USE_DOS2UNIX= yes > -USE_ZIP= yes > -USE_GMAKE= yes > +USES= gmake dos2unix Ditto. Guys, I know some of you are working on stagifying the tree very actively these days, making tens to hundreds commits a day. This is all much appreciated, cool, and awesome, but it does not mean commit messages can become sloppy. Moreover, it gives a bad example for other people. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140125064631.GA96178>